SITI WAHYUNI, (2015) A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON COHERENCE USED IN THE TWO EFL UNDERGRADUATE PAPERS: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS PERSPECTIVE. Bachelor thesis, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon.
|
Text
SITI WAHYUNI PBI 2015 (WM BLM).pdf Download (9MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Siti Wahyuni. 14111320129. A Comparative Analysis on Coherence Used in the Two EFL Undergraduate Papers: A Discourse Analysis Perspective. This study aims to compare coherence in the two undergraduate papers as noted by Eggins, Schleppegrell that coherence constructed by registerial coherence and as Halliday and Hasan stated that cohesion is a semantic ties that link sentences to another sentence. This study adopts three metafunction analysis to explore coherence of the paper is realized by situational context. This study is qualitative study which is content analysis. The technique of collecting data is documentation from two undergraduate papers in chapter 3. The result of analysis shows that registerial coherence in paper A on field is dominated by relational with 494 clauses or 43.7%. The tenor of the paper A in interpersonal mood structure is impersonality third person declarative mood with 100%. The mode in the paper A is dominated by marked theme with 60.6% and indicates that the paper A more coherence. For the data of cohesion, the paper A has fully variety of cohesion such in grammatical cohesion and conjunction has been found in the paper A with 1166 markers or 52.10% as dominant device. In lexical cohesion in the paper A is found 43 chains and reiteration gets the highest chain with 41 chains or 95.35%. in contrast with Registerial Coherence in the paper B, it is found material process with 79 clauses or 69.3% as dominant process. And the tenor of the paper B uses impersonality third person declarative mood with 99% and interrogative with 1%. And the mode in the paper B is dominated by unmarked theme with 57%. So the paper A has high level coherence and the paper B has low level coherence. And then for cohesion in the paper B on grammatical cohesion, the dominant device is reference gets 72.68%. Then, there are 11 chains lexical cohesion and reiteration is the dominant chain with 10 chains or 91% . In comparative analysis, there are some similarities and differences from those papers. The similarities exists seven points such as in categories declarative mood, personal reference „it‟ and „they‟, demonstrative reference, comparative reference, substitution, nominal ellipsis and repetition. Besides, there are also differences such as categories process type, degree of modality, mode, grammatical cohesion and its number, the personal reference and its number, conjunction and the number of lexical cohesion. All those result show that how important coherence feature presents in the writing. Keywords: discourse analysis, comparative analysis, coherence, two undergraduate papers
| Item Type: | Thesis (Bachelor) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Pendidikan > Pendidikan (Umum) > Model Pembelajaran |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan > 3. Tadris Bahasa Inggris |
| Depositing User: | rosyidah rosyidah rosyidah |
| Date Deposited: | 12 May 2017 07:39 |
| Last Modified: | 12 May 2017 07:39 |
| URI: | http://repository.syekhnurjati.ac.id/id/eprint/2925 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |