EKO BUDI PRASETYO, (2013) METHOD OF COACHING DEBATE FOR AUSTRALASIAN DEBATE FORMAT. Bachelor thesis, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon.
|
Text
EKO BUDI PRASETYO_07430362_ok-min.pdf Download (501kB) | Preview |
Abstract
EKO BUDI PRASETYO (07430362), Method of Coaching Debate for Australasian Debate Format There are many schools of debate that are used in international debate event. They depend on where the debates are held. For example WUDC (World University Debating Championship), the largest world’s debate championship, is held annually using British Parliamentary Debate format. Another example is United Asian Debating championship, which is participated by teams from The Middle East to Japan, tends to use Australasian Debating Format. Meanwhile Indonesia has its own debate championship which is called as IVED (Indonesian Varsities English Debate). IVED is also adopting Australasian Debating format. High school debate seems getting famous for recent decade. Many of high school debate events are held. The aims of these events are providing high school students to practice their English skills in competitive way as Keiger (2005) explained that “debate is an excellent activity for language learning because it engages students in a variety of cognitive and linguistic ways”. A problem, however, appears. When the students are available to go to “battle field” they are not provided with a good training that keeps them on the track. This problem rises not because of their teachers do not want to coach them, but because the teachers themselves do not how to do a correct debate. Perhaps some of them know; the problem that they face is that there is not or there are few of debate guides that are easy and fit to be applied in high schools in Indonesia. The method of this research is descriptive research. To answer the need of a good debate guide, the researcher attempts to formulate an applicable debate guide by sorting and selecting materials from various sources. This research starts from the analyzing of some debate formats. Each of these formats has their own characteristic. Both Australasian Debate Format and Asian Debate Format tend to have three debaters of each team but Asian debate format has POI (point of Interruption) meanwhile Australasian debate format does not. British Parliamentary Debate format is slightly different from the two. British Parliamentary Debate format obligates the debate team to have four debaters each team. Based on researcher coaching debate experience for more than two years, students are mostly getting bored during the training. This because the coaching material seems so complicated. Through this research, the researcher tries to formulate an effective debate method to make the trainees achieve the debate capability. This coaching debate is a simple and sustainable. This method consists of six steps that the researcher calls as “six unit”. These six steps are link one to others. Finally, the researcher concludes that the differences between debate formats that are researched are placed within the rules but the content of the debate is still the same. Meanwhile, the students’ problems of learning debate will be solved by using the “six unit” of debate training.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Bachelor) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Pendidikan > Pendidikan (Umum) |
| Depositing User: | tuti alawiyah alawiyah |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Apr 2017 04:00 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Jun 2017 05:56 |
| URI: | http://repository.syekhnurjati.ac.id/id/eprint/1775 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |